Related Articles

« Back to Recent Graduates Main

 

Associate Contracts

Most practice owners believe that the process of hiring an associate veterinarian is completed upon their locating an associate that has the desired clinical and interpersonal skills to work with the client base and the staff and that is willing to work for an agreed upon wage. Many practice owners believe that the process is over at that point in time and that there is little benefit to have a written Associate Agreement. After all, what do they have to lose?

 

All Associate Agreements Should Be in Writing

It is a good business practice to reduce any important verbal agreement to writing. An Associate Agreement is no exception and should be written and signed by both parties. This is true whether the associate is classified as an employee or an independent contractor.

All too frequently veterinarians believe that the associate they want to hire is a person of their word. They claim that it is unnecessary to have a written agreement because they are both honest and honorable individuals and it over complicates a straightforward relationship. The flaw with this logic is that two people will frequently interpret and remember different details from a verbal conversation. If you take two perfectly honest individuals and ask them about the specific terms of an agreement that arose after a verbal conversation, each one will focus on certain details that will frequently conflict with the understanding or memory of the other individual.

This problem can become serious if it involves terms of a verbal Associate Agreement relating to compensation or other significant issues. When this happens, the party that feels that he or she has been mislead (normally the associate) may start questioning whether the hiring veterinarian is honest or is trying to take advantage of him. The effect of such a scenario is that the parties who once believed the other to be honest begin to question the character of the other. This is especially important if the doctors work well together otherwise and were looking for a long-term business relationship.

This problem can easily be avoided by having a well drafted Associate Agreement or Independent Contractor Agreement. A poorly drafted agreement that fails to address important issues is frequently no better than a verbal agreement because there remains a misunderstanding or ambiguity on important issues. It is also important to understand that ambiguities in written agreements are construed against the drafters of the agreements. The effect of this is that the party that drafts the agreement, frequently the hiring veterinarian, will have any ambiguous or missing sections construed in a light most favorable to the associate and against their legal interest. The legal system has evolved over hundreds of years to protect the weak by construing the ambiguous contract provision against the drafter.

Some of the major terms relating to business issues that should be included in a written Associate Agreement are as follows:

Many veterinarians are unwilling to classify their associates as employees because of the problems that can develop if they associate does not work out and they are forced to terminate the relationship. The hiring veterinarian is frequently uncomfortable about claims for unemployment filed by the terminated associate. Veterinarians need to accept the fact that unemployment insurance fees are simply a cost of doing business. They also need to have their individual state laws examined to determine whether they are protected from payment on unemployment claims if they terminate the employee during an established “orientation” or “probationary period” to determine if the employee will work out with the practice. Assuming that your state law permits “trial periods” for purposes of unemployment benefits, you could terminate the relationship within the trial period without being exposed to additional fees for unemployment claims by the terminated employee.

Veterinarians also need to understand that they will not be able to avoid discrimination claims by having their associate’s classified as independent contractors versus employees. Most state and federal discrimination laws are not based on the worker being classified as an employee versus an independent contractor.

In practice, a trade secret can be any information that provides a business with a competitive edge in the marketplace. Some common examples of business information that may constitute a trade secret in a veterinary office include client and patient lists, patient charts and marketing strategies.

It is important to keep in mind that most courts measure the geographic area limitation radius as a bird flies as opposed to measuring based upon the distance it takes to drive the roads to a particular competing location. This rule is very relevant when an employing veterinarian attempts to enforce a Covenant Not to Compete against a former employee who had sets up a practice in a location close to the outside distance of the Covenant Not to Compete. In this scenario, one or both of the veterinarians may measure the distance by driving between the employer’s location and the employee’s new location.

It is additionally important to understand that if a court determines that the Covenant Not to Compete is unreasonable in geographic location or length of time that the court may void the entire agreement or the specific Covenant Not to Compete or judicially modify the length of time or geographic location of the Covenant Not to Compete to make it reasonable. Courts around the country differ on their preference when faced with this issue. If the employing veterinarian is located in a state that prefers to judicially modify the terms of the noncompetition agreement, the employing veterinarian should take an aggressive position on what is reasonable. The employing veterinarian can always choose to settle with a former employee if he or she chooses to not attempt to take the issue before a court. However, it is a possibility that a former associate veterinarian will choose to not violate an aggressive Covenant Not to Compete in order to avoid the costs of litigation.

In certain states, it has been held that the employing veterinarian has given consideration by permitting the associate veterinarian to retain his or her job. However, courts in many states have ruled that the employing veterinarian has not met its obligation simply by permitting the associate veterinarian to retain his or her job. In light of the uncertainty of this issue around the country, it is advisable for the employing veterinarian to provide the existing associate veterinarian with a sum of money for his or her entering into the Associate Agreement. This is especially important for an employing veterinarian in the event he or she wants to sell the veterinary practice because the buyer will reduce his offer for the practice based upon his perception of the risk that an associate veterinarian would leave and legally compete with the practice. An employing veterinarian can choose to give an existing associate veterinarian with consideration of a benefit other than a cash payment. There is no specific requirement on what the benefit needs to be or the value of the benefit. One example of consideration other than cash is payment of professional liability insurance, if not already provided, or additional funds for continuing education.

There are a number of steps that a hiring veterinarian can take to minimize the risk of hard feelings developing during the negotiations.

Talk to the associate veterinarian about what his or her compensation will be early in the negotiations. There is no benefit to delaying communicating what the hiring veterinarian’s expectations are for compensation.

A hiring veterinarian with an enforceable and properly drafted Associate Agreement has several remedies. The first remedy that a hiring veterinarian can obtain is the remedy of injunction. An injunction will take care of the immediate need of stopping the former associate from continuing to damage your practice by soliciting your clients and employees and competing with your practice. A properly drafted Associate Agreement will waive certain legal requirements to make obtaining a temporary injunction more probable until the case can be taken to trial. The second remedy for the hiring veterinarian is the remedy of monetary damages. If the Associate Agreement contains a liquidated damage provision, you will be entitled to recover the amount that was agreed upon. If the Associate Agreement did not contain a liquidated damage provision, you will be able to recover the damages that you have incurred based upon the profits that you lost as a result of the actions of your former associate. If you are able to prove that the former associate solicited your clients prior to leaving your employment, you are entitled to recover the compensation that you paid the associate for the period of time that he or she was soliciting clients while in your employ. In addition to the above, if you have included an attorneys’ fees provision in the Associate Agreement you will be entitled to recover your attorneys’ fees if you prevail.

Hiring an associate veterinarian is an important decision that could have serious adverse impacts upon your practice. Since no one can predict with any certainty that the associate relationship will be successful, it is very important that you have a well drafted Associate Agreement to protect you and your practice in the event that your associate decides to start his or her own practice at your expense.

 

Edward J. Guiducci, Esq.
Guiducci & Guiducci PC
14239 W. 69th Place
Arvada, Colorado 80004
O: (303) 355-3463
F: (303) 355-4722
C: (303) 570-0945
ed@guiduccilaw.com